Tobacco taxes too low: critics

Published Thursday July 2nd, 2009

Health groups call on N.B. gov't to boost cigarette prices, already lowest in Atlantic Canada

A1

FREDERICTON - Anti-smoking groups are calling on the provincial government to review cigarette prices.

New Brunswick has the lowest provincial cigarette tax in Atlantic Canada, an unfortunate distinction that needs to change in order to encourage more people to quit smoking, according to several health organizations.

But even though Nova Scotia just hiked its tobacco tax by five cents per cigarette, a spokesman for the provincial government said the Liberals don't have any plans to increase taxes here.

"We need to look at price. The plain truth is New Brunswick has now, in Atlantic Canada, the cheapest cigarettes," said Ellen Snider of the provincial branch of the Canadian Cancer Society. "It's estimated that when you increase tobacco prices by taxation by about 10 per cent, you get a corresponding decrease in smoking rates of four per cent."

The smoking rates for New Brunswick have dropped from 26 per cent in 1999 to roughly 19 per cent.

"We know from experience across the country that that's exactly the case -- when the taxes go up, the smoking rates go down and guess what happens with the cancer rates," said Snider.

New Brunswick's provincial tobacco tax is 11.75 cents per cigarette.

Nova Scotia's increase of five cents brings its tax to 21.5 cents per cigarette and is expected generate an additional $21.9 million for that government this year. Prince Edward Island's tax is 22.45 cents per cigarette and Newfoundland's tax is 18 cents per cigarette.

A review of cigarette prices across Canada suggests New Brunswick has the third-lowest prices in the country. According to the national not-for-profit group Non-Smokers' Rights Association, a carton of 200 cigarettes in New Brunswick costs $78.81, while a carton in Quebec costs $70.18 and $74.49 in Ontario.

The same carton would cost $100.89 in Nova Scotia, $95.70 in Prince Edward Island and $92.93 in Newfoundland. The cost in Manitoba is $93.23, compared to $92.65 in Nunavut, $104.83 in the Northwest Territories, $91.12 in Saskatchewan, $90.55 in Alberta, $87.40 in British Columbia and $92.65 in Yukon.

The federal excise duty is $17 per carton.

Julie McKeen, director of health initiatives with the New Brunswick Lung Association, said the price of cigarettes should be reviewed on a regular basis.

Tax on cigarettes should be increased "for the purpose of decreasing tobacco use only if a significant portion of resulting revenues are allocated to sustainable tobacco prevention and cessation programs," she said.

Legislation, as well as public awareness programs, can change behaviours and reduce the number of smokers, she added.

"Public policies tend to have a more universal application and can be more permanent in nature."

But Marc Belliveau, spokesman for the Department of Finance, said New Brunswick's position of bordering Quebec and Maine makes it difficult for the province to raise taxes significantly as it could result in an increase in contraband cigarettes.

"We have to keep our taxes competitive with Quebec, and we're competitive with them on taxes, but if we go higher than Quebec, the big problem that will happen there is there will be a big influx of cigarettes coming in from Quebec, both black market and people that can legally buy cigarettes," he said. "It's a huge, huge issue. It's something that we continually monitor."

Increased smuggling means cigarettes are more likely to be sold to minors, Belliveau added.

The provincial government has already taken a number of steps to reduce smoking, such as banning smoking in cars with children, restricting the sale of flavoured cigarillos, and requiring store owners to keep their cigarettes out of sight, he said.

"There's that balance of public knowledge and of protection of the consumer, and at the same time not pricing yourself out of the market to increase smuggling activity."

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (22)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Don't get me wrong 777, I agree with your other comments.
I have a cousin in moncton that is as gentle as the Jolly green giant, but ohh boy get 6 beers in him and you'll be facing the Ugly green giant. Sober this guy would probably give you his last 20 dollars if your were in trouble, but as soon as he get drinking, he's abusive to his wife and will insult his friends even pick fights,even beat up his father in law bad enough the ambulance was needed while he was drunk. This guy spent years in jail in seperate time for domestic violence,only while drunk, sober,he is such a different man.
Booze will help you make wrong choices,If I'd never experienced it myself I couldn't say.Dad, my mother left him 40 years ago cause he'd come home drunk and abuse us,he even tried to kill me on 2 seperate occassions when I was 8 years old,all stuff he wouldn't do while sober.I grew up with a family of alchoolics and I know for a fact what alchool can do,and it's not always nice.
6
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
s. king, Ca on 02/07/09 04:39:38 PM AST
I'm glad you were able to solve your problems and I do admit it enhances decisions and actions, but like I said you are responsible for your own actions/addictions/choices.
4
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
777 777, Riverview on 02/07/09 04:41:24 PM AST
Sorry to hear about that King.

There is one unique factor about drugs and alcohol in order to have them take effect, they need to be consumed and that is a choice... bottom line.
4
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
777 777, Riverview on 02/07/09 05:00:09 PM AST
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice...

Geddy Lee said that, lol
5
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
s. king, Ca on 02/07/09 05:46:21 PM AST
OK 777 i get your point,no regrets, I've made better choices since I was 1 uncontrolable drinker.
I only wish they'd leave me smoke in peace since it doesn't make me a menace on the road and a danger to someone else life when I CHOOSE to drive my van or my Freightliner,lol.
They are hitting us smokers under the belt and what if I choose not to quit, who has the right to force me to quit. We do have rights,where are they???
5
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
s. king, Ca on 02/07/09 05:52:55 PM AST
Geddy Lee did sing that, s king. But they're Neil Peart's words.

Just sayin.
1
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Michael Hall, Moncton on 02/07/09 09:52:17 PM AST
Oh, here we go with the anti-smoker "estimates" again:

-"It's estimated that when you increase tobacco prices by taxation by about 10 per cent, you get a corresponding decrease in smoking rates of four per cent."-

Sounds to me like yet another potential cash-grab. How can they possibly proclaim that "the smoking rates decrease by 4 percent as a result of higher tobacco taxes"? Do they ever mention they determine that by tobacco sales and the taxes paid? If those sales go elsewhere and taxes are not paid, does that necessarily mean that smoking rates have declined? I highly doubt it. I am more inclined to believe they are just telling us what THEY want us to hear.

I say the government should tell these "anti-smoking" groups to be happy with what they have achieved and start minding their own business now. We made the mistake of letting them run amok with their anti-smoker rules. Now, they have long gotten carried away power-happy.

Enough is enough! It keeps getting more ridiculous!
0
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Ray Man, Moncton on 03/07/09 02:00:40 AM AST
"Tax on cigarettes should be increased "for the purpose of decreasing tobacco use only if a significant portion of resulting revenues are allocated to sustainable tobacco prevention and cessation programs," she said.-

Yes... I get it. Gimme moar money!!!! Isn't that what it REALLY is all about? Too many people make careers out of meddling in other peoples' business.

-"Legislation, as well as public awareness programs, can change behaviours and reduce the number of smokers, she added."-

Change behaviors? What business is it of hers to change others' behaviors? Maybe she should be reminded that smokers' behavior is LEGAL as it pertains to their smoking. That's it, that's all.

If she does not like my behavior (of being a smoker), surely nobody is forcing her to associate with me is there? Or forcing HER to change HER behavior to satisfy my own opinions, to suit me?

They wonder why they are often referred to as "Nicotine Nazis" and such?

This has all been tried before...
0
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Ray Man, Moncton on 03/07/09 02:11:19 AM AST
One last comment (for now):

-"According to the national not-for-profit group Non-Smokers' Rights Association, a carton of 200 cigarettes in New Brunswick costs $78.81, while a carton in Quebec costs $70.18 and $74.49 in Ontario."-

A couple questions here. What business would a group called "Non-Smokers' Rights Association" have with tobacco taxes anyway? As far as I know, non-smokers do not pay tobacco taxes do they? They are not affected either way, are they? So what is their connection? What would this group's cut from a tobacco tax increase be?

As far as I am concerned, non-smokers' rights have been satisfied long ago. Smokers have been booted out of every single public place there is and they are starting to venture into peoples' private vehicles and homes to boot. What is left that they could legitimately complain about now, that would not be just plain whining?

Nothing!

I am thinking it had nothing to do with non-smokers' rights to begin with. More like money and CONTROL!
0
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Ray Man, Moncton on 03/07/09 02:25:10 AM AST
"Tax on cigarettes should be increased "for the purpose of decreasing tobacco use only if a significant portion of resulting revenues are allocated to sustainable tobacco prevention and cessation programs," she said.

Legislation, as well as public awareness programs, can change behaviours and reduce the number of smokers, she added."

---

I don't agree with the whole 'behaviour changing' theory. My suggestion is to just focus on keeping young people from becoming smokers in the first place. Eventually the smoking population will practically disappear on it's own. It just takes time to work through the generations of people who were raised with smokers all around them. Taxes will make zero difference.
1
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
A. Reader, Moncton on 06/07/09 12:30:23 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles