Scrap Innovation Fund, save jobs: teachers

Published Friday July 3rd, 2009

Union to meet with minister, wants money used to reverse recent job cuts

A1

FREDERICTON - The New Brunswick Teachers' Federation hopes to convince government to reverse recent cutbacks and scrap a controversial fund the union says is mired in bureaucracy and required the province to hire additional employees to administer the program.

Officials from the union will meet with Education Minister Roland Haché this morning to ask him to direct the money in the $3.4-million Innovative Learning Fund towards rehiring the 580 employees, which include library assistants and teaching assistants, who recently received lay-off notices. The cuts saved government $2.9 million.

"The funding in the ILF was taken from classrooms -- it needs to go back," said Brent Shaw, co-president of the federation. "We need the resources in place."

The $5-million fund was created to give grants to teachers who develop innovative ways to teach literacy, science and numeracy. Although former education minister Kelly Lamrock refused to scrap the fund, he reduced it to roughly $3.4 million this year.

After the fund was created, government hired 16 employees to work at the school district level to help administer the program. The new employees spend half of their time working on the fund and the rest of their time on other duties. There are also two employees listed in the provincial government's directory who work on the fund out of Fredericton.

"The process, they've made it so complicated at the department level that they had to hire all those half-time people out there," said Shaw. "That half-time person is out there helping teachers go through all the foolishness of having to apply for the money that was already theirs at one time. That's part of the problem with this; it's bureaucracy at its finest."

Haché is refusing to comment on the fund until he wraps up meetings with unions next week.

The Department of Education was unable to provide the salaries of the program's employees. However, a spokeswoman said money from the fund isn't being used to pay the employees.

"They are teachers who help other teachers," said spokeswoman Hillary Casey. "They help guide the teachers through creating and developing their programs to apply for ILF funding."

Despite government's earlier statements that it would refuse to scrap the fund, Shaw said he remains optimistic that the recent cutbacks will be reversed.

Any grants promised to teachers should be honoured as plans are already under way to spend the money or a portion of a grant may have already been spent, he added.

"How optimistic am I? I'm very optimistic," he said. "If anybody will listen to reasoning and process it and move forward, then this is one of those things that's pretty motherhood and apple pie."

Although pink slips have already been given to a number of employees, Shaw said he doesn't expect it would be too difficult to reverse the cuts, even if some employees have been bumped out of their positions.

"I personally wouldn't see anybody having a major issue with getting their jobs back."

Opposition leader David Alward said he supports the teachers.

"I'm certainly supportive of what the message has been from the teachers and other organizations including various parents as well. We've been saying the same thing all along: that it makes sense to have the supports in the classrooms."

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (16)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

J.R. you are so far off base here. The fact that we teachers stood up against the elimination of class size reductions, is because the cuts could, and should, have come first from the ILF. If that program was cut first, and more cuts were needed, maybe teachers would have considered the proposal, we'll never know.
Don't blame teachers for not taking cuts to the classroom, when an exorbitant amount of funding was being poured into a program that benefits a very few number of students.
3
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Rick Cuming, Grand Falls on 03/07/09 12:39:45 PM AST
JR is Lamrock!
1
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
I want my NB back!, Moncton on 03/07/09 02:40:11 PM AST
refresh my memory but i believe the teachers said they would agree to the class size reduction delay IF LAMROCK GUARANTEED THESE JOBS and he refused therin this problem
5
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Carl Bainbridge, moncton on 03/07/09 03:37:47 PM AST
How did this come to be an either-or between the innovation fund and teacher jobs? Expenses in the school system, and for that matter the provincial budget as a whole, are much greater than the $5 million fund.

Given the rather questionable performance of the school system to date, something like the innovation fund is clearly necessary. The world of education is changing, and the New Brunswick school system cannot remain in the back woods forever.

Surely the money can be found somewhere in the provincial budget to promote school innovation without turning against it those very people it's supposed to help.
3
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Stephen Downes, Moncton on 03/07/09 08:36:35 PM AST
Stephen, I'm not against the ILF, I've recieved a grant and it has aided my classroom. I just think TA's and librarians reach more students in my school then my ILF project does. I wish we could have both, but one assumes that money can't be found ANYWHERE if TA's and librarians are cut right?
Surely they are only cut as a last resort!
3
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Rick Cuming, Grand Falls on 03/07/09 09:36:03 PM AST
So, if the literacy rates coming out of our schools were so abysmal WITH the TA's, et al, who was at fault then? I assume there was a whipping boy at that point as well?

It's been obvious for some time that the status quo is NOT teaching all children, period. And literacy is such a huge part of your entire life-it literally scared me to send my child to school after seeing the scores for my area.

Regardless of money/resources, I'm hard pressed to see those test scores change-I see a lot of hyperbole, but I don't see a lot of change truly for our children, who are, at the end of the day, supposed to matter here.

Get us past 2nd to last place for literacy in Canada-perhaps then you can stick with tried and true. It's not working.

0
Thumbs Up
5
Thumbs Down
Bud White, Moncton on 04/07/09 04:09:11 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles