N.B. won't ban phone use in cars

Published Wednesday October 29th, 2008

Ontario becomes fourth province to introduce legislation prohibiting cellphone use while driving

A1

FREDERICTON - Ontario has become the fourth Canadian province to ban the use of cellphones by motorists, but there are no plans to bring in similar laws in New Brunswick.

Public Safety department spokeswoman Lisa Harrity said New Brunswick sees the use of cellphones for talking, e-mailing or text messaging in the same way it views several other distractions.

However, Harrity said the province is watching to see how well the legislation works in Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Quebec and now Ontario to see if it leads to a reduction in motor vehicle accidents.

For now, New Brunswick believes the Motor Vehicle Act covers the issue of distracted drivers well, Harrity said.

The act says motorists can be charged "without driving with reasonable consideration for others on the highway."

Guilty motorists can be ticketed, lose up to three points on their licence and fined $172.50.

They can also be charged with driving with "undue care and attention," which results in a court appearance. If guilty, the motorist can lose a minimum of five points and fined at least $604.50.

In Nova Scotia, the fine for using a hand-held phone while driving is $164.50 for the first offence, $222 for the second and $337 for any subsequent offences.

RCMP Cpl. Claude Tremblay said police are aware cellphones and other electronic devices distract drivers, but there are no statistics to show how serious the problem is in New Brunswick.

"Unless we have a third party, an eyewitness, how can we prove the cellphone was the cause of an accident," the media relations officer said.

"When someone gets into an accident, they are not going to admit they were on the phone. They aren't going to say they were distracted. They aren't going to tell us and their insurance company about the cellphone."

Tremblay is not convinced hands-free cellphones are a safe alternative.

"We want people driving who have 100 per cent of their attention and focus on the road," he said.

Fredericton City Councillor David Kelly, who is also a licensed damage appraiser, is pushing the New Brunswick government to ban the use of cellphones by motorists.

"Sadly, I see the end result of accidents caused by the distraction to the drivers of a motor vehicle when the usage of cellphone played a role in the collisions," Kelly said.

The Insurance Bureau of Canada praised the Ontario government for bringing in the legislation, but also called for the introduction of a public education program to teach drivers about all forms of distraction.

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (16)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Jason Price, I totally agree with you. On two seperate incidents, the same day, in Fredericton, my mother and myself were almost broadsided by a woman who was laughing and talking away on her cell phone, didn't look sideways, she was off in her own little world, didn't even respond to me laying on the horn, and went about her merry way. Because the breaks were slammed on, I have a nice welt from my seat belt. In the course of the same day, some hours later, a man ran a red light ....he too was oblivious to what was going on around him, didn't seem to realize that he wasn't the only one on the street, so he just kept cruising on through the red light, so, I'm thinking, are they going to wait until someone is killed (I'm sure there have already been fatalities or serious injuries) from someone who is using a cell phone. It's great to think that human life is worth the risk.
7
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
S. M, Fredericton on 31/10/08 04:31:53 AM AST
Well well well !!!
Cell phones distracting drivers ?????

How about this one for distractions !!!

Man or Woman,no difference who is at the wheel.
DOG SITTING ON DRIVERS LAP,LOOKING OUT THE WINDOW,
Driver trying to get around a corner in a busy intersection,
seems to put more care in the dog seeing out the side window,than the car coming straight at them,that has the right of way !!!!
Put your dog in the back seat,out of the drivers way,don't worry about that cell phone driver,he sure is more careful with His/Her driving than the one with the stupid dog,or,
Should I say(stupid driver)???
10
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Silver o, mct on 31/10/08 11:10:48 AM AST
I can see banning the use of driving while holding cell phones, though I don't feel strongly about it. I would be very opposed to banning hands-free cell phone usage. People drink coffee, eat, put on mascara, fiddle with CDs, fix their hair, engage in heated conversations with other passengers or turn around and yell at their kids.... as one poster suggested, do we ban everything? That's it - no kids in cars; they're so distracting. Frankly, with what I've observed of drivers here - as a newcomer - I'd rather see an emphasis on the people who tailgate, those who pass on a solid yellow line, and those who can't stay on their side of the road, than I would cell-phone users - even though I do agree with bumper sticker, "Hang up and drive."
6
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Melissa E., Fredericton on 31/10/08 02:55:46 PM AST
Why wait to ban them-in todays poll, the majority of readers who voted on this issue were in favor of a ban. I too have been nearly t-boned at an intersection by a distracted cellphone user, seen a woman almost run a lady & her baby with 3 other lanes of traffic stopped at a flashing overhead crosswalk light, & many other such indidents.I can't understand why people seem to need a cellphone glued to their head all the time. What did they do before the cell became affordable. Yes there are other distractions,but if cellphone use was banned it might be like seatbelts- the specific threat of a fine may be enough incentive to pull over when talking,rather running someone down while distracted in this way. Why does the department of safety think that they should have a wait & see approach? there's nothing to lose by bringing in this ban-they might save a few accidents, & also collect fines if nothing else. I hate the "sheep mentality" of these decision makers. Not very bright Public Safety!
3
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
n. nikiba, moncton on 31/10/08 10:34:57 PM AST
This comment has been removed due to a violation of canadaeast.com's Terms of Use, Section F. Interactive Features. Click here to review the Terms of Use.
s flowman, moncton on 03/11/08 04:30:46 PM AST
I once had an "incident" while using my cellphone. I was driving home & was on the phone traveling at 70mph. As I passed under a bridge some kids tossed a handful of gravel which blew out my side window showering me with glass. I didn't swerve wildly and have an accident, I simply hung up my call & pulled over. Upon closer inspection both headlights had small holes in them & the gravel could clearly be seen inside the lens.

My point is, being on the phone didn't contribute to an accident despite everything else being perfect for such an outcome.

Is a cellphone more of a distraction than a CB is for a truck driver hauling tons of goods in his 18 wheeler?

Everything is a distraction when you're driving a car, the radio, the conversation with the passenger, GPS and cellphones, can we realistically ban them all?
If someones lack of attention causes an accident they should be punished to the full extent of the law but when drunk drivers get let off with fines it makes such bans a joke.
2
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Andy Hawkins, Richibucto on 03/11/08 10:35:39 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles