Aircraft contrails raise questions

Published Monday June 1st, 2009

Expert says vapour trails have no direct effect on human health, but can affect it through environmental changes

A3

Ever wonder about those clouds planes leave in the sky? About what effect they have on the environment and, more importantly, our health?

Click to Enlarge
Contrails are the condensation left by airplane and jet exhaust. Scientists say contrails are not hazardous to health, but they are harmful to the environment because they alter the Earth’s temperature and they release fuel chemicals, just like from cars, but on a larger scale.

Rod McKinnon of Moncton wants to know, and he's looking to the government for answers.

Just like cars, planes release exhaust. Because they fly at high altitudes, the cold temperature causes the exhaust to turn into water vapour and crystallize. These clusters of crystals resemble thin clouds, known as contrails.

But McKinnon believes there's more to these contrails, especially the ones that persist for long periods of time. He calls them 'chemtrails.'

"They don't disappear," he said. "I've seen planes leave contrails and then I notice them disappear. The chemical sprays do not disappear; they form clouds and we don't know what effect they have on our Earth or our people when it comes down in rain."

McKinnon isn't alone in his queries.

Citizens and scientists across North America have been studying 'chemtrails' for years. There are multiple theories about them, some even wildly suggesting they contain hazardous chemicals aimed at modifying the weather or controlling the population.

Believers says chronic asthma, flu, fatigue, and respiratory problems can be directly related to these chemtrails, but a leading climatologist disagrees.

"The idea of it falling to the ground in a concentration great enough to have an effect on our health is preposterous," said Dr. David Travis, a climatologist with the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater.

Travis began researching contrails after the September 11 terrorist attacks, when he noticed an increase in the Earth's temperature range in the three days air traffic was grounded. He said contrails have an effect on climate, but have no direct effect on human health.

"Their (chemtrail theorists) belief is that this is some kind of conspiracy, that they're being sprayed," he said. "It's not spraying; they see too many crop duster movies -- we don't spray contrails. They're not being done as some kind of conspiracy. It's just airplanes flying through atmospheres that happen to have the kind of conditions that support contrail formation."

Contrails that last longer than others are simply the result of a colder, more moist atmosphere that the plane is flying in, Travis said, and at the point when a contrail is persisting, it is mostly water vapour. He said air traffic is so high in the atmosphere that there's no way chemicals from jet exhaust could have an effect on people.

Coverage of contrails has increased dramatically over the past decade. Travis said this is the result of an increase in air traffic, not a sudden 'spraying' initiative.

"What's really happened is we've had a huge increase in the number of airplanes in the sky and the climate has become more favourable for the persistence of contrails," Travis said. "The climate's gotten warmer on the surface (and) it actually makes it colder at the altitude where airplanes fly and that actually makes it more favourable for contrails to persist."

The Greater Moncton International Airport announced earlier this year that domestic travel is up 11 per cent and international travel up nine per cent since 2007.

"The thing to worry about with contrails is not the direct human health effect, but their intervention in the climate system," said Dr. Michael Oppenheimer, a professor of geosciences and international affairs at Princeton University and 2007 Nobel Peace Prize winner.

According to Oppenheimer, the ice crystals formed by jet exhaust have two effects on the Earth's climate. The crystals reflect sunlight and act to cool the Earth, or they form the nuclei that clouds grow on, and by creating clouds, they trap heat and warm the Earth.

"They do have a direct effect; we don't know if it's large or small, we don't know if it's warming or cooling," Oppenheimer said. "We haven't yet really worked out what the balance is between those two effects."

The effect on the Earth's climate, whether it be warming or cooling, can lead to more illness and disease.

"Disease is now more prevalent in areas where they never were because they're able to flourish with the changes in climate," said Inka Milewski, an environmentalist with the Conservation Council of New Brunswick. "There's pressures on the environment that cause new diseases to emerge."

And while jet fuel is a major contributor to climate change, Milewski said there are more immediate dangers we should be aware of.

"There are pollutants in the community that are of far more concern (than) something that occurs five miles up," she said. "Immediately what comes to mind is your neighbours using pesticides on their lawn. That to me would pose a much more immediate concern."

The main concern with air traffic is the particulars, said Milewski, which are micro-fine particles that rain out in the atmosphere and can causes cancer and cardiovascular disease. Carbon dioxide and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are also hazardous, but they are found in car exhaust too.

"It's like any fuel that gets burned; there are contaminants associated with it."

Milewski said the only way to reduce contrails is to reduce air traffic, which would require taking government action.

"Demand legislation that regulates the amount of emissions from air travel, just like from cars," she says. "These do work. Force the aviation industry to reduce these emissions through regulation."

And that's something Rod McKinnon can agree with.

"I'd like to see enough people have a voice," he said. "I'd like to see enough people make it an issue and draw enough attention to it so we can get some answers," he said.

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (15)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Growing up in the '70s I remember seeing contrails everyday as jets flew over my home. What are contrails? As a jet flies, moisture is released from the jet engines. If the jet is high enough in the sky (a high altitude) where the humidity (moisture in the air) is low (very little moisture), then the moisture released from the engines of the jet immediately forms ice crystals because of the speed of the jet through the cool air. That is the trail that forms behind the jet. Like seeing your breath on a cold day in winter.

Contrails never last more than a few seconds because water is a heat conductor, so it absorbs the heat of all the air around it, and the heat of the sun. That's why when you see a contrail behind a jet, it disappears as quickly as it appears, and the trail stays the same length the entire time as the jet flies overhead because it is constantly being replenished as fast as it disappears.
86
Thumbs Up
17
Thumbs Down
Bruno WatchTheSky, Los Angeles on 01/06/09 06:54:10 AM AST
You will never see a contrail appear among clouds because clouds form at lower altitudes of high humidity. Clouds are a direct result of high humidity. Contrails form in low humidity, and dissipate just as quickly.

If the trail behind the jet is thick and/or the trail persists even as the jet has flown out of sight, then what you see is not a contrail. It is not water vapor, but rather must consist of some other particulates. Most people call them 'chemtrails', chem being short for chemical.
80
Thumbs Up
18
Thumbs Down
Bruno WatchTheSky, Los Angeles on 01/06/09 06:55:50 AM AST
In Los Angeles, one day you will see a beautiful clear blue sky, and the next day you will see a massive display of spray trails. As you watch, the trails spread and form variations of clouds that resemble cirrus clouds. I've watched jets spraying trails until the sky is completely covered horizon to horizon, even over the ocean, as far as I can see. What's funny is that when I see a small clearing in the spray, where I can see the sky, lo and behold, a jet comes through and sprays a new thick line through that clearing.

My suggestion to everyone is that you watch the sky every chance you get until you can judge easily for yourself You will notice all kinds of patterns like multiple parallel lines, tic tac toe, DNA (two jets flying parallel, one a slight distance behind the other, and they criss cross each other's path again and again!) and more. On more than one occasion I've even seem them spray a circle!
69
Thumbs Up
16
Thumbs Down
Bruno WatchTheSky, Los Angeles on 01/06/09 06:58:53 AM AST
If you find a website that tells you contrails can last several minutes and even hours, then you know that you can not trust that website. They are spewing false science in an attempt to steer you away from concerning yourself with what they are doing in secret, right in front of you, in the sky.

I suggest you do more research to discover what particulates they are spraying. I can assure you that whatever it is, it's not good for us. Otherwise, why would they keep it a secret? After WWII, England admitted to spraying the population with all kinds of elements as experiments. In the '50s, the CIA used car exhaust, and subway ventilation systems to spray elements in NYC as experiments.

Watch the sky.
62
Thumbs Up
18
Thumbs Down
Bruno WatchTheSky, Los Angeles on 01/06/09 07:02:11 AM AST
"Carbon dioxide and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are also hazardous"

Who is this fool? Carbon dioxide is not hazardous, it's a nutrient for the atmosphere. Plants thrive on Carbon Dioxide. This article spews tons of false science.

"There are pollutants in the community that are of far more concern (than) something that occurs five miles up," she said. "Immediately what comes to mind is your neighbours using pesticides on their lawn. That to me would pose a much more immediate concern."

Look, they are preparing you to give up control over your own property. There are bills in Congress right now to force the average person to give up control over the plants and water on their own property. Seriously folks, wake up.
93
Thumbs Up
15
Thumbs Down
Bruno WatchTheSky, Los Angeles on 01/06/09 07:28:30 AM AST
Bruno you are spreading falsehoods. Contrails length of staying together is variable. Winds in the HLA break-up these trails in some cases don't allow them to form. If the winds are light in that structure the contrails cam last for a long time.

Jet acft travel at altitudes well above most cloud formations except when CB's develop and that is an exception; cirrus clouds (formed as ice crystals) are wispy and high in area where these jets fly. In any case, when the jets transition from low to high airspace they fly through clouds. Most jets travel above FL280 (apprx 28,000').

Regardless of altitude, a jet engine expels exhaust just like a combustion engine does. There are chemicals in jet fuel; somedays, more than 1000 acft flying above us in HLA transiting continents. That exhaust has to settle somewhere!!

During the 3-day ban of flights, by the 3rd day one could smell the difference in the air. I truly pitty LAX area with all this pollutent cause so much poor air.
12
Thumbs Up
53
Thumbs Down
T. Wright, Greater Moncton on 01/06/09 12:09:23 PM AST
T. Wright. You did not contradict anything I said. LOL. Jets may fly at any altitude, but they will not leave contrails where there are clouds (high humidity).

Here, watch this video... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRot4ihq1JU

Those are chemtrails, not contrails. I suppose you also believe that Carbon Dioxide is hazardous to the atmosphere. LOL. The disinformation propaganda in this article is so extreme, that nobody with any level of common sense will buy into it.

Sorry, but the truth is coming out quickly. People are waking up.
44
Thumbs Up
14
Thumbs Down
Bruno WatchTheSky, Los Angeles on 01/06/09 02:49:05 PM AST
The main purpose of contacting this newspaper was to bring attention to what is going on in our skies and to expose it for what it "is". Not how this article played out with all these so-called "experts" opinions. Might as well call them professional chemtrail debunkers.
The reason why "some citizens or scientists wildy suggest they contain hazardous chemicals" is because some of them have actually captured samples finding barium and aluminum oxide. Sounds like "hazardous chemicals" to me.
I can assure you, since I contacted the paper and did the interview, that I certainly do not agree with the statement by Ms Milewski (since it was "implied" that I could surely agree), "Demand legislation that regulates the amount of emitions...". Nor am I "looking to our government" for answers. If the worst is true about what is going on above us, then it's treasonous.
Also, when the trails start on one side of the city and finish on the other, doesn't that tell us something ??
29
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
R U Awake, Greater Moncton on 01/06/09 10:39:04 PM AST
I am assuming the scientists interviewed have been in school longer than either of you combined. If you took a few minutes to research their names, you'll find two of them are leading scientists in the field of contrails. And if you actually read the article, you will see that it does not imply that Mr. McKinnon agrees with Milweski's comment about the effect of contrails of the environment, but in fact he agrees that the public should be asking these questions, and demanding answers from the government rather than just letting it go unnoticed.

Just a thought.
16
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
James Watterson, Moncton on 02/06/09 10:55:35 PM AST
Thanks for your interest and comments James. There are far too many occurences of these sprays to ignore. In the 70's or before we did "not" see ANY of this. None. It wasn't an issue. No-one noticed because they weren't "spraying" back then.
I do not agree with: "Milewski said the only way to reduce contrails is to reduce air traffic, which would require taking government action. Demand legislation that regulates the amount of emissions from air travel, just like from cars," she says. "These do work. Force the aviation industry to reduce these emissions through regulation." So, yeah, I'm not too impressed about those statements that I supposedly "can agree with". I don't. The point is, they are "not" from a jet's normal fuel emissions. Also, I have not seen 1 single airplane (that leaves these sprays) come into or out of our airport. Not 1. Of any size.
And I don't respect anyone's opinions if I believe them to be full of lies or towards an agenda that is other than the truth.
14
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
R U Awake, Greater Moncton on 03/06/09 08:12:08 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles