
Fluoride at centre of Metro debate
Published Friday October 9th, 2009

Moncton councillor seeks answers on fluoride in Moncton water; city follows Health Canada guidelines

Saying, "fluoride is a toxic waste that probably does more harm than good," Moncton Councillor-at-large Pierre Boudreau called on city staff this week to report back at the next public meeting of council on the amount of fluoridation done to the city's municipal water supply.
The answer to that question, says Ensor Nicholson, the city's director of water services, is 0.7 milligrams per litre, less than half the Canadian maximum allowable concentration in Canada.
"We follow Health Canada's lead on this, and their expert panel set it (the optimal amount) at 0.7, so that's what we do," Nicholson said.
While Boudreau worried aloud at this week's public meeting of city council that excess fluoride might even cause a form of cancer, Nicholson said the city policy to date is to defer the findings of Health Canada's expert panel of scientists that was assembled from across North America in 2007.
That panel found the, "weight of evidence does not support a link between exposure to fluoride and increased risks of cancer."
Nevertheless, Boudreau noted that the expert opinion on what is an optimal amount of fluoride has dropped over the 50 years since it was widely introduced to drinking water and said, "the question now is not how much fluoride is too much, but do we need it at all?"
That, he said, was particularly relevant since fluoride is prevalent in toothpastes and much of our processed foods and beverages because factories tend to use fluoridated municipal water supplies in their processing.
Health Canada's panel said the main, "concern for fluoride is still considered to be 'moderate dental fluorosis,'"
However, the panel's consensus was that this should not be considered a toxicological end-point, but that this endpoint is significant because it correlates with cosmetic problems."
Excessive fluoride can actually darken the teeth it's meant to strengthen, but other than the cosmetic issue, Health Canada saw no real health concern until much higher concentrations of fluoride are introduced to humans.
That can sometimes happen in untreated well water, the City of Moncton's Nicholson said, if the wells are in areas where high amounts of fluoride occur naturally. In those cases, fluoride can also affect bone health.
As for adverse effects on teeth from water treated up to the maximum acceptable concentration, "there is no reason to be concerned about the actual prevalence of very mild and mild dental fluorosis in Canada," Health Canada's panel said. "In addition, the actual prevalence of moderate dental fluorosis in Canada is low, and all evidence suggests that since 1996 there has been an overall decreasing trend of dental fluorosis in Canada."


Disabled








Search Articles


Comments (6)
All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.
Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.
Opposition: Scientific, Respectable & Growing
Over 2,640 professionals urge the US Congress to stop water fluoridation until Congressional hearings are conducted, citing scientific evidence that fluoridation, long promoted to fight tooth decay, is ineffective and has serious health risks. See statement:http://www.fluorideaction.org/statement.august.2007.html.
11 US Environmental Protection Agency employee unions representing over 7000 environmental and public health professionals called for a moratorium on drinking water fluoridation programs.
The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment,Canada’s leading voice on environmental health issues opposes fluoridation.
Great Lakes United opposes fluoridation.GLU is organizations representing environmentalists, conservationists, hunters and anglers, labor unions, community groups, and citizens of the United States, Canada, and First Nations & Tribes.
Until the councillor brings in his medical degree and some peer reviewed papers that clearly show the benefits of halting fluoridation, I'd say it's probably best to defer to people who actually know what they're talking about (Health Canada).
I've drank 1 to 2 liters of Moncton tap water a day, for the last 30 years and it wasn't until I was 29 that I needed my first and only does of antibiotics. I'd say I'm pretty healthy. So much for fluoride being poison.
In 2008, New York City spent approximately $24 million on water fluoridation ($5 million on fluoride chemicals)(1a). In 2010, NYC’s fluoride chemicals will cost $9 million (1b).
Yet cavities are rampant in NY’s fluoridated populations (1c) and cavities are rampant in most fluoridated towns, cities, states and countries See http://www.FluorideNews.blogspot.com
References: http://tinyurl.com/MoneyDownTheDrain
The proliferation of cavities is not a result of fluorides ineffectiveness, but of the average consumer buying into add campaigns from bottled water, pop, and sports drink manufacturers.