Energy deal brings stability

Published Friday November 6th, 2009

Premier says N.B. will have better energy sovereignty dealing with Quebec than unstable Middle East, Venezuala

A1

Premier Shawn Graham has had a few people ask this week how he thinks historians will one day judge his proposal to sell NB Power to Hydro-Québec.

Click to Enlarge
RON WARD/TIMES & TRANSCRIPT
Premier Shawn Graham

The difference at a conference in Dieppe yesterday was that it was a room full of historians from across the nation asking the question.

The annual conference of the Association for Canadian Studies drew about 80 academics to the Ramada Inn yesterday, and Premier Graham came from Fredericton to address them. After his prepared remarks he invited questions from the audience and was immediately asked about the power deal.

He immediately cited the late Louis J. Robichaud, whose introductions of the Official Languages Act and the Equal Opportunities program had been the subject of some of his prepared remarks.

"I know if those issues had been brought before the public at that time for a referendum, they would never have passed," Graham said. "Great leaders have to have the courage of their convictions to move forward with transformational change knowing there is going to be a negative impact in the short term but a positive impact in the long term."

Recalling how he as a boy had the chance to know Robichaud because his father had served in Robichaud's government, the premier noted "the negative impact is often on one's personal life and on one's ability to take on the differences of opinion which are so important when change occurs."

Besides the arguments already made this week about erasing 40 per cent of the provincial debt, lowering power rates and cutting carbon emissions, he also said "we're reducing future risk for our province," whether it's the cost of decommissioning Point Lepreau 30 years from now or refurbishing the Mactaquac dam.

Predicting there will one day be a federal tax on carbon, the amount of fossil fuels in current New Brunswick energy production would mean higher rates if the status quo was maintained.

But there was a bigger issue with fossil fuels that the premier turned back at critics who say selling NB Power to Quebec equated to giving up some of our sovereignty.

"Today New Brunswickers are saying to themselves, 'why should we have to buy our energy from Quebec?' The fact is in New Brunswick we buy our oil from the Middle East to fuel our power plants," he said. "We buy our coal from Venezuala to run our coal-fired plants. I think it's a wise decision today that we're tying ourselves to a stable partner in a secure country who's a neighbour."

Noting that most of his speech to the historians a few moments earlier had been with how New Brunswickers from what were once two solitudes had spent the past 40 years not merely learning "to live together, but to build together," the premier said he believed the deal with Quebec would be another example of neighbours building together.

 

Comments (25)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

How can so many people be wrong on this one . If the Premier is so confident , then lets have a vote. I would sooner see 1 million dollars being spent on a vote than on selling this idea thru the media and the Ministers
76
Thumbs Up
7
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
f. trevors, miramichi on 06/11/09 07:27:25 AM AST
Shawn boy do us all a favour ; just pack and leave your office and don't come back !!!!!!!!!!!!!! We don't need idiots here in N.B. !!!!!!!
65
Thumbs Up
12
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
red lobster, shediac on 06/11/09 07:55:24 AM AST
Shawn wake up you are a far cry from a great leader. This is not the 1960's it's 2009 the information age helps protect people from such things as Lieberal BS by availabilty of information so the people can decide whats right and wrong and by the way you are wrong.
63
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Allen H., lincoln on 06/11/09 08:32:31 AM AST
My God, my God..did I read this right? Is Shawn Graham comparing himself to Louis Robichaud???
49
Thumbs Up
4
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
joe blow, moncton on 06/11/09 08:57:50 AM AST
"...The fact is in New Brunswick we buy our oil from the Middle East to fuel our power plants," he said. "We buy our coal from Venezuala to run our coal-fired plants..."

ALL of our thermal plants are being scheduled to shut down in the next five years, you said so yourself. So where we get our current fossil fuels from is irrelevant.

You are trying to sell us a "five year deal" with HQ out of one side of your mouth, then telling us not to look more than five years to the future out of the other side.

Nuclear and HEP, whether it be from Quebec or NFLD, is the future. And far futher than five years from now.

You lack vision, Graham. You are surely the worst leader in NB's history.
53
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
JustRight OfCenter, Fredericton area on 06/11/09 09:05:02 AM AST
O.K. every one all together now ; SHAWN MUST GO !!!! SHAWN MUST GO !!!! SHAWN MUST GO !!!!
47
Thumbs Up
6
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
red lobster, shediac on 06/11/09 09:34:20 AM AST
When Robichaud introduced the program of Equal Opportunity, he was reviled from one end of the province to the other, and especially in cities. He was not considered great then. Only the passing of time proved that he was right. The same will happen with this NB Power deal. the passing of time will prove this to have been the most important decision and the most beneficial since Equal Opportunity. This should not be a partisan political issue but a decision based on logic. As usual, the naysayers will be proven wrong.

However, I am in favour of an election on the issue. Once people have a chance to learn all the facts, a majority will support the deal like a majority supported Equal Opportunity when there was an election on the issue.
11
Thumbs Up
35
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
J. R, Moncton, NB on 06/11/09 10:12:44 AM AST
If I read the post against the deal above, I do not see any logical arguments against. It seems those posters [prefer to pay 5% more a year for the next 30 years for their electricity and keep the debt of 5 billion which will have to be repaid plus interest.
12
Thumbs Up
34
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
J. R, Moncton, NB on 06/11/09 10:14:24 AM AST
Where does the five per cent a year come from? Graham, in his wisdom used the figure three per cent for the next five years. Now its FIVE per cent? Why??
Its almost impossible to get accurate figures or projections.....spin, spin, spin./.......
40
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
joe blow, moncton on 06/11/09 10:18:37 AM AST
The Irving propaganda machine is hard at work once again. Since the Irvings will be benefiting the most from the HQ deal, they should be banned from reporting on the subject.
42
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
C. DUGUAY, Riverview on 06/11/09 10:45:34 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles