Letters

Published Friday July 3rd, 2009
D8

Seeking contact with Munn family

To The Editor:

Can you help? I am trying to locate a family called Munn who my father spent time with during 1940-41 while doing his RAF service in Canada.

I have recently come across photos and a diary and Moncton features regularly in it. I am holidaying in Eastern Canada in September and it would be nice to meet or communicate and put some meaning into the pictures.

I realize that time has moved along. I am wondering if your newspaper could print the family name and see if we get any response to the name Dennis Jones. I am willing to provide more info if we can pursue this further.

Ian Jones

Tel: 0441603402642

Norwich, Eng.

Lamrock doing Premier's work

To The Editor:

We should feel sorry for Kelly Lamrock. He has been the target of the many, many letters to the editor concerning the decisions to remove classroom assistants and library associates; he has been vilified, lambasted, and insulted.

But the former education minister is the wrong target -- the true target should be Premier Shawn Graham. Lamrock is carrying out his primary duty of implementing the educational policies of Premier Graham.

The day that any minister, including the new education minister, does not carry out the policies of his premier, that is the day he or she is fired.

Does anyone believe that Lamrock did not receive the approval of Graham for the two recent and other educational decisions that were made? Unfortunately for Lamrock, he was defending the indefensible as his illogical reasoning demonstrated.

The public should not trade Graham's boyish smile for the proper education of their children and should hold him accountable for his failed policies.

Frank P. Belcastro,

Grand Digue

Highway work is dangerous

To The Editor:

The closure of Highway 133 in the area of Boudreau Office between Shediac and Barachois is another example of the arrogance of this government that doesn't listen to the people and again makes decisions that will affect the economic impact of small businesses, the social aspect of a community and could cause a fatal tragedy in the riding of Shediac Cap-Pelé.

The closure of this highway is preventable with the installation of a temporary culvert at little cost to our government compared to the recent $50 million bailout of Atcon Construction and the millions of dollars invested in Royal Oaks.

Imagine the Acadian Trail Highway 133 being obstructed, small businesses that attract their clientele will be severely affected, next door neighbors and family split up and god forbid that someone takes a serious heart attack in the area of Paturel's Shore House and that the ambulance would be in Shediac, which means the paramedics will have to take Highway 15 to 933 and re-enter on 133 with an extra time frame of at least 12 to 15 minutes, then return on its path to reach a hospital. Twenty-five to 30 minutes is crucial and may be avoided.

Many other examples could be given to strengthen the installation of a temporary culvert to keep open a much needed community road that affects thousands of locals and tourists each and every day.

While reading the local newspapers on a regular basis, it is astonishing to me how many discontented electors in the province of New Brunswick are expressing their frustrations. They're clearly indicating that the Liberals and the caucus lost the trust of the people and what is even more mind-boggling is to see how many Liberal card holders are openly talking against the Shawn Graham government and its incompetent cabinet members because of the lack of respect shown for the concerns of their constituents and the needs of their individual ridings.

It is time to let the Liberal Party and government know that we will no longer be taken for granted and that we are tired to only see them react and do the right thing after we take action and express our frustration in various files such as education, little Hugo trust fund, transportation, New Brunswick Power Commission fee increases, dishonouring contracts, raising taxes in their first budget only to see them pat themselves on the back for decreasing the same taxes that they raised.

People should not forget that this government did not honour their election promises and the policies in their red book that were used to be elected by the general public. Hopefully we will not be fooled by the recent Liberal cabinet shuffle and all the upcoming bribes to win you over before the upcoming election.

Leo Doiron,

Shediac

Why can't you pay in cash?

To The Editor:

Citizens of rural New Brunswick need more choices for cable and Internet to keep these companies in line with customer service and selling such service at reasonable rates. Competition is good for the consumer, which we are lacking it in this province.

I have been paying in cash my monthly bill to Rogers for some time now and prefer it to other means. I understand that Rogers needed to separate their sales department from their video store and did not mind going into Champlain Place to pay my bill, but what got me irate is the fact that they now no longer accept legal tender at the counter.

I was told that they accept cheques or credit card as payment, but if I wanted to pay in cash I had to use the machine at the entrance of the store or over the Internet. This machine, however, does not give change back.

That's OK; I do not need Rogers to keep care of my money as the difference goes as a credit against your next bills.

I called customer service and was told it was the first time they heard of this issue and they contacted their Rogers store in Champlain Place. They had told me that the management at the store changed their policy and that such operations vary from location to location.

I asked if Rogers employed the employees and if the location was a Rogers' store? The representative on the phone replied, yes. I was then told that two locations in Moncton took cash payments: a location on Paul Street and on Mapleton Road.

I went to this location on Paul Street and was told by the clerk they only sold the phone cards and they did not take payments. I called Rogers customer service again and told them I was not a gopher and had rights as a customer. I was then told I could make a cash payment in Sussex.

If I had a selection in my area for such services I would not be with this company any longer and I challenge all Rogers' customers that make payments to do so in cash at their Rogers location in Champlain Place at the counter.

We have rights as customers and this company needs to recognize that. I would also like our premier and prime minister to look into this company's dealings. I find it very strange that Rogers' clerks refuse to accept legal tender as payment.

Francis Cormier,

Scoudouc

 

Disabled

Commenting has been disabled for this item. Existing comments appear below but you may not add a new comment at this time.

Comments (14)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Lamrock may have been doing Graham's work, but it is his arrogance and total ignorance of education that made him the target of so many people's ire. He acted as if he were a god and no one had the right or intelligence to question his decisions.
16
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Concerned Educator, NB on 03/07/09 08:16:33 AM AST
Francis, you do have rights as a consumer, you have the right to choose another cable/phone/internet provider. You do not have the right to tell Rogers what they do and do not accept as payment. Like I said, if you do not like the way they conduct business you have the right to go elsewhere and I urge you r to practice that right, I do all the time.
0
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
777 777, Riverview on 03/07/09 09:27:47 AM AST
777 777 - while you are correct in saying he can't tell Rogers how to run their business, I believe it is illegal for them to refuse legal tender... Canadian Currency. As long as its legitimate bills or coin (rolled if of sufficient quantity) then the business has to take it.
0
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
concerned citizen of moncton, moncton on 03/07/09 11:27:59 AM AST
I've never heard of that law? If that's so, what about all the corner stores, restaurants and other places of business that refuse 50 & 100s? Would that be against the law? They are refusing legal tender.
0
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
777 777, Riverview on 03/07/09 11:35:59 AM AST
I encourage you to use the same computer you are commenting on to set up an e account and pay via the internet - save time, driving expense and be able to see your record of payment instantly, no trips to the bank cause you can do that all online too.

Wake up and join the present.
0
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Thereis Nogod, Saint John on 03/07/09 11:42:55 AM AST
I hate Rogers. I would not get anything else through Rogers even if they were the sole provider of oxygen.

I even had a rep from rogers call my house, looking for my 1 day late $30 payment, and call me a deadbeat. NO LIE. Then he hung up on me, so I called the company and was told there was no way to know who had called me, as they don't record their phone calls or keep track of who calls who.......LIES!! They are out for money and don't give 2 cents about their customers!
0
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
M. M., Northern, NB on 03/07/09 01:15:41 PM AST
actually 777 777 i am pretty sure that the law covering refusing to accept legal tender is around but not enforced much however i am not sure what the story is on the 50/100/1000's but i technically think they are legally supposed to accept them.

i believe to a degree this actually extends to credit and debit cards but again not sure
0
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Carl Bainbridge, moncton on 03/07/09 02:35:23 PM AST
to concerned educator both points are right graham just kept his hands clean he either gave instructions to lamrock or let him run with it either one and then hid quietly while the fur flew

lamrock on the other hand really only had himself to blame, his refusal to discuss options as well as the " My way and only my way" attitude made this problem grow to the point that it is not going away tho i think maybe the librarians, TA's and Interventionists as well as affected parents and teachers should take a page from the doctors and take the province to court to get the issue reversed
5
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Carl Bainbridge, moncton on 03/07/09 02:41:37 PM AST
I did some research on the currency act and could not find anything saying that if one wishes to pay with physical currency (money) that the place of business must accept as payment, there doesn't seem to be any mention that I could find, maybe I overlooked it. All it says is that there must be some from of exchange whether it be electronically or what have you. If anyone can shed some light on this law with facts, please do so, it would be interesting to know. Thanks.
0
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
777 777, Riverview on 03/07/09 03:25:01 PM AST
i will do some looking because it is honestly not the first time i heard this
1
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Carl Bainbridge, moncton on 03/07/09 03:31:07 PM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles