Send in the carpet-baggers?

Published Tuesday November 3rd, 2009
D6

To read (let's say scan) the more than 600 news reports and editorials that have issued since last Thursday, when Shawn Graham announced the deal with Hydro-Quebec for the major assets of NB Power, you'd think the province had relinquished its birthright in Confederation to a cabal of evil carpet-baggers.

The "how dare he" and "we weren't consulted" crowd have jammed the printed pages, airwaves and viaducts of both the mainstream and online media with their worries, fears and indignation over a sale that, if approved, would eliminate $4.8 billion, or roughly 40 per cent, of public debt -- as if this were of trifling significance.

Far more important, they bluster, is the humiliation attached to the transfer of the utility's ownership to an extra-territorial behemoth which can't be trusted to keep New Brunswick's best interests in mind as it seeks to plunder the fat energy markets of the U.S. northeast -- markets that, by all rights, should have been ours to conquer.

The reaction, while not entirely rational, is understandable. No one likes to have the rug pulled out from under him -- even a worn and tattered one. If NB Power was a burden on the pocketbooks of every man, woman and child in the province, at least it was our burden to bear.

Who asked Graham to lighten our load, anyway?

But even a cursory examination of the memorandum of understanding reveals less peril than perspicuity -- starting with the clear-eyed, if uncomfortable, conclusion that successive governments, including the current office-holders, have not been particularly effective stewards of New Brunswick's long-term energy aspirations.

It's one thing to wail, "There goes the neighbourhood." It's quite another to recognize that the "neighbourhood" has always been largely imaginary. And without the fiscal muscle to leverage massive investments in the province's so-called energy hub, the chances of turning fiction into fact have been, for years, illusory. So, how can you lose something you never really had?

In fact, despite statements to the contrary early in Graham's tenure, NB Power is actually structured for sale. Its quasi-independent operating units are their own cost centres. Its bond-holders are private, international conglomerates. Its senior management are accomplished scions of big business, not big government.

You can quibble over the choice of suitors. (After all, Hydro-Quebec is another publicly owned utility). But it's hard to argue, with a straight face, that New Brunswick's power company is, first and foremost, a civic trust whose fate should be determined through referendum or election.

It's an asset and, like all assets, it's in play.

Much more relevant is whether the proposed deal is good for consumers either in the short term or over the long haul. Naturally, the provincial government says it's brilliant because it fixes residential rates at current levels for five years and provides industrial users with favourable and predictable energy costs.

Moreover, it insists, rate increases after 2015 will be held to inflation which, historically, runs at 1.5 per cent a year -- far less than the average 3.3 per cent annual hikes customarily levied (until now) by NB Power.

And should the provinces of New Brunswick and Quebec run afoul of one another . . . well, that's what the Energy and Utilities Board is here to arbitrate.

Frankly, Graham and his spokespeople may be gilding a few lilies in all of this. Whatever is signed today -- or five months from now -- does not guarantee happy consequences for New Brunswick in perpetuity. Regulatory regimes exist to be challenged. And no one can predict the future of greener, more renewable forms of home-grown energy in the province.

Then again, few predicted the catastrophic effects of the global economic downturn on New Brunswick's fiscal health, or the multi-million-dollar delay in the refurbishment of Point Lepreau, or, indeed, Irving Oil's decision to indefinitely postpone its plans to build a second refinery in Saint John.

Even less predictable, perhaps, has been Shawn Graham's dawning realization that deeds, not words, define truly transformative change. And those who inveigh against a deal that will indisputably enrich them -- at least for now -- can take some small comfort in knowing that their premier seems to appreciate the distinction.

* Alec Bruce is a Moncton-based journalist. His column appears in this space every Tuesday and Thursday. He can be reached via www.thebrucereport.com

 

Comments (9)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

I have an honest question about the $4.8 billion debt.

How is that debt paid, right now? Is it paid directly out of provincial coffers (in other words, are our provincial taxes directly servicing this debt)?

Or, is it presently serviced and paid completely by NB Power (in other words, the electricity rates we all pay would be servicing the debt).

It's an important distinction.

If it's our power rates servicing that debt, then the 'cost' of that debt is built into our power rates. But when HQ takes over, our rates won't be going down. Neither would our taxes.

If our provincial taxes are servicing that debt, and not the power rates, then this might actually be a good deal because it could mean lower provincial taxes.

I don't know where I stand, but I would like a clear answer to this question.

20
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
cbm cbm, dieppe on 03/11/09 08:54:45 AM AST
I'm wondering if M. Alward, chef of the Conservative party,would prefer to increase the utility rates of NBers of at least 3% per (perhaps double digits if we actually want to pay against the 4.8 Billion) year because thats what will happen if the sale doesn't go through in March. What is his energy policy? Why did his party talk about selling NB Power assets when he was in cabinet if he's so against it??? Pure politics...
10
Thumbs Up
10
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
52 Leblanc, Moncton on 03/11/09 11:36:14 AM AST
CBM you have an excellent point!! I would imagine NBPower uses its own revenue to paydown the debt as any corporation would do.

With that in mind, NBP made $90m net profit in 2008, any payment to the debt would have been before the 'net' was realized.

Mr. Alward, Mr. Graham or who ever is premier of this province has no input on NBPower increases (directly). NBPower has the power (no pun) to increase their rates by (up to) 3% every year without asking anyone!!

A rate change >3%, must be submited to the Public Utilities Board for their approval. During the process government can oppose or agree with their request; PUB has to make the final decision. Remember NBPower is an entity by itself, governed by their own board!!

Your fear of Shawnocchio's threat of 3% is unfounded because NBPower already can do that. McKenna started this NBPower process; Lord sub-divided it, now Shawn is selling it; he has to 'change various laws' to accomplish this act eg; the no-sell bill!!
10
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
T. Wright, Greater Moncton on 03/11/09 12:13:49 PM AST
Another Pro NB Power sale article in an Irving owned paper. Surprise, Surprise!!!!! And once again not all the fact are honestly given. In the article Mr. Bruce states that the inflation rate is historically 1.5%, well I calculated the annual inflation rate from 1990 to 2008 (for the past 19 years) and the average inflation rate is 2.2548% That's 50% higher then the 1.5% stated in the article, this is a HUGE difference!!!! Also, since 1989, the inflation rate was below 1.5% only 3 times since 1990, the last time being in 1998 (11 years ago).
14
Thumbs Up
3
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
C. DUGUAY, Riverview on 03/11/09 12:20:54 PM AST
cbm cmb, excellent question?

The interest on the NB Power's debt is paid from NB Power's revenues, i.e. power rates. Under those circumstances we will still be paying the interest on the debt with no change in our power rates, except for the Irvings.
15
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Halsey T., Riverview on 03/11/09 12:23:47 PM AST
No facts here just a filler article with a slant.Where are the facts,and analysis by non partisans ??
7
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
w m , moncton on 03/11/09 02:01:17 PM AST
"And should the provinces of New Brunswick and Quebec run afoul of one another . . . well, that's what the Energy and Utilities Board is here to arbitrate."

They've always done so well for us in the past.
I can't wait to see if they approve the 115% increase in delivery charges for natural gas... since we already pay the highest prices in Canada for natural gas whats another 115% tacked on?
6
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
J B, Riverview on 04/11/09 09:58:53 AM AST
To CBM. The payments on the debt are currently made by NB Power. What we pay for electricity SHOULD cover the cost of producing and transmitting that electricity plus payments on the debt. However, it does not as NB Power continuously has to borrow more money. Hydro-Qyuebec will borrow the money to pay the debt of NB Power ( which was guaranteed by NB) and will in future be making the payments on that debt and of course that is included in the overall rate we pay. The difference is a well managed company that can make its payments and make a profit and another company which is bankrupt.
4
Thumbs Up
0
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
J. R, Moncton, NB on 04/11/09 11:30:06 AM AST
52 Leblanc has a very good point. Is Mr Alward in favour of increasing electricity rates by 5% to cover the interest on the huge debt and keep that debt that is ever increasing. I have not heard Mr Alward give us an answer on that
2
Thumbs Up
1
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
J. R, Moncton, NB on 04/11/09 11:31:51 AM AST
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles